The reading and the lecture both discuss the genuinity of coins discovered in Maine by native Americans one thousand years ago. The author claims that the coins are fake. However, the lecturer refutes the author's assessment. He states that the coins are original and demonstrate three reasons to cast doubt on the claims made in the reading.
The first allegation of script against which the orator argues is the great distance of coin discovery away from the Norse's settlements. In contrast, the professor highlights the fact that the Norse did not stay in one place. Instead, they move from one place to another to collect other objects. Confidently, the lecturer argues that other objects which belong to the Norse were found in the same place. As a result, this provide an evidence that the coins re not fake, but genuine.
Second, according to the text these coins are not genuine because no other coins were found in the same region. The speaker also find this idea debatable. He bolster his opinion by stating that the Norse settlers did not stay in the same region all the time, but they use to travel back to Europe. when they did so, they use to pack all their belongings
Finally,The lecturer contrast the fallacy of the passage that the native American did not use coins when the Norse arrived to the US. Again the lecturer disagree with the author's claims. He acknowledges that Native American did not use coins as money, nevertheless, they still consider them as something valuable. This provide an evidence that they are real Archaeological pieces.
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals. Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to th 76
- 34 - Integrated: Why did the sea cows in Siberia become extinct? 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A good leader should spend more time listening to other people's ideas than taking his or her own ideas. 73
- Some people have ambitious dreams and keep pursuing them, but other people always focus on realistic goals and try to achieve them. Which do you think is better and why? 90
- Watching television is bad for children. Do you agree or disagree? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...fake. However, the lecturer refutes the authors assessment. He states that the coins ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'bolsters'.
Suggestion: bolsters
...eaker also find this idea debatable. He bolster his opinion by stating that the Norse s...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... the same region all the time, but they use to travel back to Europe. when they did...
^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
... but they use to travel back to Europe. when they did so, they use to pack all their...
^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... back to Europe. when they did so, they use to pack all their belongings Finally...
^^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , The
... to pack all their belongings Finally,The lecturer contrast the fallacy of the pa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, nevertheless, second, so, still, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91353383459 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4421076938 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537593984962 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1635457656 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6875 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355002408064 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108276147457 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855073911389 0.0662205650399 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219217712593 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442307168545 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.