declining of population of sea otters
The passage and the lecture both discuss the reason of quickly declining in the numbers of sea otters in that has a significant effect on region's costal ecosystem. Both explain two dominated explanation about decrease in population of them, environmental pollution and predators. The passage claim that the pollution explain this event more convincingly in comparison to attack by predators and give three reason for this. Even though, the lecture denies all those reason and states that the reason of attacking by predators is more conceivable.
First, according to passage, existence of industrial chemical materials like oil rigs along the Alaskan cost, is an important evidence for declining of this kind of animal by pollution of industrial factories. In contrast, the lecture denies this assertion by stating that there were not any dead sea otters along this coast, so it is not possible pollution caused death of this animal. While declining in population of this animal without any evidences of their dead bodies can be explained more conceivable.
Second, the reading points out that pollution explanation is more likely true because of death some other mammals like seals and sea lions. It can be explained by universally pollution effects on the entire ecosystem. But, the lecture state that orcas changed their diet from whale to small mammals because of decreasing the numbers of whale causing by human hunter. So, they ate small mammals like seals and sea lions besides sea otters in order to survive.
Third, the reading says that irregular pattern of declining them could happen by environmental factors like ocean currents. By contrast, the lecture contends that this uneven pattern can be justified better by large size of orcas. In fact, they weren’t able to pass thorough shallow water and rocky place because of their large size. As the shallow water and rocky place are the location with stable sea otters' population, considering reason of decrease in the number of sea otter is more reasonable and conceivable.
- Nowadays people are busy with many things If you were given a short period of time what would you choose 1 learn to play a new sport you never played 2 learn to cook food in a different way 3 learn to do some hand made work like clothes 87
- Sometimes people are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The group will be helped more by a person who is willing to do what other group members want than by a person who often strongly insists 73
- consulting with others or making decision alone 76
- solutions to get rid of dangerous for birds caused by glasses 80
- solutions to get rid of dangerous 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 387, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... pollution caused death of this animal. While declining in population of this animal ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 409, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'otters'' or 'otter's'?
Suggestion: otters'; otter's
... place are the location with stable sea otters population, considering reason of decre...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, second, so, third, while, in contrast, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 30.3222958057 188% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 329.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22188449848 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66745337508 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516717325228 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8237466872 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.533333333 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26737624297 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856922115988 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941516528357 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162755178954 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222817661943 0.0443174109184 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.