Dutch painter Rembrandt
The reading and lecture both describes about the painting ' Potrait of an Elderly woman in a white bonnet' painted by painter Rembrandt. The author of the passage believes that the painting is not done by Rembrandt and puts forward many facts and clues for evidence. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made by the author of the reading. She says that it was painted by Rembrandt and puts forward three main points that wil be discussed below.
First of all, the author of the passage says that the woman in the painting is dressed in a way that is not usually the way how Rembrandt paints his pictures. The woman is dredded in luxurious fur collar, which is very costly but the hat she wears doesnot look luxurious and rather it looks like servants' cap and concludes that Rembrandt would never do such a mistake. The lecturer rebuts this claim. She says that according to the review of the painting made by the panel of experts, the collar has been painted over the top of it after 100 years so as to increase the value of the painting.
Secondly, the author states that light is reflected on the face of the painting even with the presence of dark fur collar. She is skeptical because of the fact that dark colour would absorb light and hence refelectionn of light is not possible. He says that it is not the style of Rembrandt. The lecturer, on th other hand, contradicts this by saying that if the collar was removed and simple light coloured cloth would surely reflect light.
Finally, the author contends that the painting was done on several pieces of wood sticked together, But usually, Rembrandt qould paint his paintings on wood panels and concludes that it was not his work. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She argues that the wood material on which painting is done is taken from the same tree that Rembrandt used to paint his other paintings. She also shows the example of the self-portrait of Rembrandt to prove this claim.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | nusybah | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Muggle | 80 | view |
- doubt on portrait 3
- Working in Teams 3
- It is more important to keep our old friends than it is to make new ones 66
- Movies and Television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. 76
- A reading passage like the following will appear on your computer screen. You will have 3 minutes to read the passage.In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecture both describes about the painting Potrait of an Elderly woman in a white b...
^^
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ward many facts and clues for evidence. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 5, column 549, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...nted over the top of it after 100 years so as to increase the value of the painting. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...ce of dark fur collar. She is skeptical because of the fact that dark colour would absorb light and henc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, as to, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 347.0 270.72406181 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65706051873 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34054026056 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489913544669 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7899560792 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6875 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141003399338 0.272083759551 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556457511494 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587019050051 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928011933528 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499892054222 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 53.8541721854 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.