Essay topics: The emperor Claudius of Rome ruled an empire spanning three continents between 41 and 54 CE. His reign was of massive importance to the history of ancient European civilization. In fact, the emperor was among the most innovative, fair, and wise in all Roman history. However, because Claudius suffered from physical handicaps and spoke with a stutter, ancient authors were biased against him. Consequently, their descriptions of his time in power are almost uniformly hostile, and many ancient historians ignore all of the good that he did.
Claudius’s reign was important for its major innovations. He conquered the island of Britain and incorporated it into the Roman Empire. He also built a new harbor for Rome and oversaw the construction of several new aqueducts, which brought clean water into the city. He even created laws to protect the rights of slaves and expand Roman citizenship to new people. All of these facts suggest that he was a gifted ruler with strong judgment, despite what may be found in histories written by his detractors.
Another reason for the hostility of ancient authors toward the reign of Claudius has to do with the fact that the writers were usually of senatorial class. Claudius was not elected to power by the Senate and severely limited its traditional powers during his reign. However, illustrating his wisdom, instead of entrusting high bureaucratic positions to senators, he preferred to give them to trustworthy slaves and former slaves (freedmen), whom he felt were more loyal to him. They worked efficiently, creating a bureaucratic framework for all future emperors. Claudius should be praised for giving political opportunities to new groups of people such as former slaves and even the women of the imperial household, including his wives.
The topic was about the importance of Claudius to the ancient Roman history and the author argued how Claudius ruled the Rome wisely and the span his reign to three continents.
The first point the author told us that Claudius was the most innovative, fair and wise emperor in Roman history. In spite of all his good deeds, the authors of ancient Rome's were against him because he was physically challenged and stutters when he talks. The professor counters this argument by saying; it was true that some ancient Roman authors betray him, books like IClaudius. Claudius physically challenged body and his stutters show the weakness of the empire.
The second point, the author presents, the major innovations had occurred in his ruling era. He built a new harbor and few aqueducts which were brought clean water to the Roman citizen. He conquered the island of Britain and incorporated with Roman Empire. He created laws for free slaves and expands new citizenship for new Roman peoples. The author said Claudius was the gifted ruler and had a strong judgment. The author also told ancient authors were against Claudius because he was not elected and authors were senatorial. He limited traditional power and distributed it among slaves and other trustworthy peoples. The professor counters this point by saying, though he did some good, like built aqueducts, but he was not a gifted ruler. He murdered his previous emperor. In case of, having a strong sense of strong judgment, he was a terrible judge for example sometimes he judged without hearing both sides. He conquered Britain because he wanted to show his power and destroy the denizens of Britain and enslaves them. It was true that slaves were loyal to him but most of them were corrupt ask for bribery to the peoples of Rome. Claudius was not completely with slaves, he actually likes gladiator game and killed many peoples for his pleasure.
The last point the author presented was, Claudius was praiseworthy because he gave the political opportunity to new peoples and imperial household like his wives. The professor counters by saying, he killed his previous emperor left Nero for his successor, who was the wort emperor of Roman history. And Claudius did not give any opportunity to the imperial household or to the slaves. Even his last wive, she killed him by giving him poison.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 58
- In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers, CleanAll was found to remove 40% more dirt and kill 30% more bacteria than the next best cleanser. Furthermore, a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with CleanAll used far 23
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor. 50
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position 58
- Essay topics: People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ain and incorporated with Roman Empire. He created laws for free slaves and expand...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, second, so, for example, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 7.30242825607 274% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 22.412803532 201% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1373.03311258 143% => OK
No of words: 395.0 270.72406181 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96455696203 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47431801503 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473417721519 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.9 419.366225166 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 3.25607064018 369% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3067387022 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1363636364 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9545454545 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 7.06452816374 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226114404769 0.272083759551 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815710965635 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762444912933 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200553014027 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746676994079 0.0443174109184 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.