Glass is a favored building material
The author cites three resons to support the view point that three solutions can be used to prevent birds from getting injured. Nevertheless, the lecturer argues that these three soultions are not effective.
Firstly, the author argues that replacing regular class with one-way glass is useful as birds can not see through a window, making them understand that there is a solid barrier and will nor fly through it. However, the lecturer offers an opposite stand that birds will still fly into it. To be more specific, one-way class reflects real things in the sky like a mirror, making birds aware of that it is the real sky and fly into it.
Secondly, the author contents that painting colortful lines or other designs on regular window glass can prevent birds from getting injured and people inside still can see through the openings where there is no paint. On the contrary, the speaker refutes this solution that it will make people inside feel too dark. In order to prohibit birds from flying through the window, the empty space has to be made very small unless birds will regard it as holes and fly through it. In this way, people inside will feel too dark and can not see outside.
Thirdly, the author says that using artificial magnetic field will lead birds away from buildings, given the fact that birds rely on sensing magnetic field to navigate in the right direction. Nonetheless, this view is also counteracted by the lecturer that it does not work well. Although birds rely on magnetic field to navigate, this ability is only used in long distance. When birds fly in short distance, they depend more on eyes or the bright of light, making the usage of artificial magnetic field ineffective. Eventually, birds will still fly through the window.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-15 | nusybah | 88 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | Vivian Chang | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | rodriannnn | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | reza_fattahi | 80 | view |
- Your friend plans to reduce his living expense He has following three options 1 Find a roommate to share the room to reduce costs 2 Buy fewer expensive electronic devices like smart phones 3 Cook more at home buy fewer expensive food items and not go to r 73
- When a new technological device becomes available some people buy it right away others wait until many have adopted it Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is viewed as a bad quality for a person to have but in fact it s a good quality for a person to have 76
- Your friend plans to reduce his living expense He has following three options 1 Find a roommate to share the room to reduce costs 2 Buy fewer expensive electronic devices like smart phones 3 Cook more at home buy fewer expensive food items and not go to r 42
- TPO72 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, well, as to, in short, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85430463576 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27250765452 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506622516556 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0290033576 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.714285714 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06452816374 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0207198817905 0.272083759551 8% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00717845808335 0.0996497079465 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.017590424746 0.0662205650399 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0130470573952 0.162205337803 8% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131135131755 0.0443174109184 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, well, as to, in short, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85430463576 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27250765452 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506622516556 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0290033576 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.714285714 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06452816374 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0207198817905 0.272083759551 8% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00717845808335 0.0996497079465 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.017590424746 0.0662205650399 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0130470573952 0.162205337803 8% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131135131755 0.0443174109184 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.