Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows T

Essay topics:

Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows. There are, however, several solutions that responsible businesses can use to prevent injuries to birds.
One-Way Glass
One solution is to replace the regular, clear glass with one-way glass that is transparent in only one direction. The occupants of the building can see out, but birds and others cannot see in. If birds cannot see through a window, they will understand that the glass forms a solid barrier and will not try to fly through it.
Colorful Designs
A second solution is to paint colorful lines or other designs on regular window glass. For example, a window could have a design of thin stripes painted over the glass. People would still be able to see through the openings in the design where there is no paint, while birds would see the stripes and thus avoid trying to fly through the glass. Architects can be encouraged to include colorful painted patterns on glass as part of the general design of buildings.
Magnetic Field
The third solution is to create an artificial magnetic field to guide birds away from buildings. Humans use an instrument called a magnetic compass to determine directions—either north, south, east, or west. Bird research has shown that birds have a natural ability to sense Earth's magnetic fields; this ability works just like a compass, and it helps birds navigate in the right direction when they fly. A building in a bird flight path can be equipped with powerful electromagnets that emit magnetic signals that steer birds in a direction away from the building.

The writer proposes three solutions to prevent birds from crashing into windows, for them cannot distinguish between glass and open air. The lecturer, however, challenge all these solutions. He is of opinion that none of these solutions are convincing.

The passage states that birds cannot see through one-way glass and therefore they will not understand that the glass form a solid barrier. Nevertheless, the speech points out that one-way glass will reflect like a mirror and causes another trouble for birds. Since birds don't understand mirrors, they will think the sky or tree on the mirror are the real one and fly into them.

The writer asserts that the colorful design will serves as a caution to birds not to fly through it. Conversely, the speaker says that birds are not able to understand this caution. Birds will perceive the spaces between the stripes as holes and fly through it. If people want to stop birds to crush into the window, then they have to make the spaces between the stripes small and that in turn will make people inside the building uncomfortable.

The writer mentions that we can create artificial magnetic field to guide birds away from buildings since birds have natural ability to sense Earth's magnetic fields. However, the speaker points out that setting artificial magnetic field will not be effective. Birds typically use the magnetic organ to guide their flying over long distance like migrating from cold to hot country before winter. In short distances, however, birds will not sense these artificial magnetic field, so artificial magnetic field can't be a practical approach.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-15 nusybah 83 view
2023-06-27 YasamanEsml 80 view
2023-06-15 Vivian Chang 78 view
2023-02-26 rodriannnn 76 view
2023-01-29 reza_fattahi 80 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user frk629 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... another trouble for birds. Since birds dont understand mirrors, they will think the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'serve'
Suggestion: serve
...r asserts that the colorful design will serves as a caution to birds not to fly throug...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 508, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...tic field, so artificial magnetic field cant be a practical approach.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, in short

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12030075188 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39421448252 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537593984962 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9737910484 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2857142857 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260443271488 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924953033179 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081472730059 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162025557839 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060541881169 0.0443174109184 137% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.