The reading and the lecture are both about the cloud seeding, a solution in the problem of farmers which is hail. The cloud seeding is for reducing hail from clouds by adding silver iodide into the cloud. However, there is an argument about this solution. The author of the reading feels that cloud seeding is effective to protect crops from hail. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He is of the opinion that cloud seeding is absolutely not effective for this crisis.
To begin with, the author argues that cloud seeding was effective in laboratory vexperiments. When the scientists put silver iodide into the cold water vapor, it produced snow instead of the hail. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that the silver iodide actually prevents anything forming from the cloud. In other words, it can prevent producing rains in the cloud. It can be another problem, lack of water, to farmers who are cropping.
Secondly, the writer suggests that evidence from Asia also shows that cloud seeding is effective to prevent damages. In the article, it is said that there are several cases in urban areas that cloud seeding has been successfully used to control the hail in some Asian countries. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that as comparing the circumstances between the United States and several Asian countries, other results are bound to come out. The cropping area between both countries are different. In Asia, the cropping area is almost urban. In contrast, the agricultural range in the United States is rural. One of the factors that can affect is pollution. We all know that rural areas have less dirty air than urban places. Hence, it would have been inevitable to fail.
Finally, the author posits that the local study in the United States shows absolutely successful results of experiments. They did monitoring directly to observe the damage due to hail. The experiments discovered that the hail has reduced the impact of the hail compared to previous year. However, the lecturer position is this experiment is affected by variation of circumstance. He notes that there was natural variation in the environment. Therefore, cloud seeding had nothing to do.
- The Chevalier de Seingalt 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement it s better to make friends with intelligent people than with people who have a sense of humor 100
- Some people like to buy books to read others like to borrow books from libraries or from other people Compare the advantages of these two ways of reading Which do you prefer Why 80
- People learn in different ways Some people learn by doing things other people learn by reading about things others learn by listening to people talk about things Which of these methods of learning is best for you Use specific examples to support your choi 60
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea 55
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'monitor'
Suggestion: monitor
...essful results of experiments. They did monitoring directly to observe the damage due to h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore, cloud seeding had nothing to do.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 10.4613686534 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1373.03311258 136% => OK
No of words: 369.0 270.72406181 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07317073171 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56119785101 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50406504065 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 419.366225166 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 13.0662251656 207% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6863203034 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.3333333333 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 21.698381199 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.62962962963 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 4.33554083885 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260385576032 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662253076208 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489620871415 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15603598953 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306919839856 0.0443174109184 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 63.6247240618 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'monitor'
Suggestion: monitor
...essful results of experiments. They did monitoring directly to observe the damage due to h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore, cloud seeding had nothing to do.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 10.4613686534 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1373.03311258 136% => OK
No of words: 369.0 270.72406181 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07317073171 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56119785101 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50406504065 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 419.366225166 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 13.0662251656 207% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6863203034 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.3333333333 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 21.698381199 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.62962962963 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 4.33554083885 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260385576032 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662253076208 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489620871415 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15603598953 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306919839856 0.0443174109184 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 63.6247240618 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.