Instead of holding books or newspapers people nowadays normally hold electronic devices and watch bright screens to receive information and news Although it is much more comfortable than reading through paper materials there are many side effects of elect
Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss electronic devices. While the reading passage explains the side effects of electronic devices, the lecture refutes all the points mentioned in the passage using its own reasons and evidence.
To start with, the reading passage claims that electronic devices inhibit individuals from thinking critically. It claims that the lack of professional views, as well as the abuse of content in electronic devices, are harmful. The lecture, on the other hand, rebuts this opinion by stating that electronic devices actually improve critical thinking. While paper materials provide the opinion of one person that can lead to biased opinion, electronic devices offer various perspectives to a certain topic.
Second, the reading passage mentions the dangers that electronic devices pose to our health. Excessive use of electronic devices can lead to eye problems and brain damage. However, the lecture argues that electronic devices do not harm our health if they are used with regular breaks. According to the lecture, there is no good evidence to prove that electronic devices damage our health. It claims that the symptoms mentioned by the reading can also be caused by using paper materials. Therefore, the problem is not with electronic devices, but our bodily habits.
Finally, the last point in the reading passage states that the use of electronic devices can prevent people from communicating with each other. It uses an experiment to prove its opinion. Nevertheless, the lecture refutes this claim and explains that electronic devices actually improve social skills. Through electronic devices, individuals have access to information on diverse topics which cannot be obtained through books. This familiarity allows people to share feelings and thoughts with each other.
In conclusion, the reading passage mentions three different side effects of electronic devices. The lecture opposes all of the points using its own reasons and evidence.
- The media pay too much attention to the lives and relationships of celebrities such as actors, singers or footballers. They should spend more time reporting the lives of ordinary people. 74
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 79
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents should allow children to make mistakes and let them learn from their own mistakes 88
- Television sports shows such as Olympic are a good source of motivation for youths who do not like to exercise much. To you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 117, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...electronic devices. The lecture opposes all of the points using its own reasons and eviden...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52117263844 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62688184512 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495114006515 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5430988347 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2105263158 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1578947368 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167011211139 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062773895174 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337541617367 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10753912693 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128884612312 0.0443174109184 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.