integrated
The reading claims that we are experiencing a global warming and the evidence of that is clear and provides three reasons of support. While, the professor states that there is no conclusive of proof , we just don't know and he refutes each of author's reasons.
To begin with, the article avers that data from instruments across the globe indicate a warming trend. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this point by explianing that it true but if we take all thermometers and average them, we will find that in the last century, the temperature was risen. He emphasized that not all readings are trusted since not all thermometers well maintained. He says that if we take just thermometers which well maintained, especially in Europe and the US, we will there was no warming trend after 1970.
Second, the article posits that scientists have reported ans alarming rate of breaks in the ice shelves in Antarctica. Conversely, the professor casts doubt on this point by discussing that this evidence is flawed. in fact, he states that it is true that there are large breaking of icebergs, however the article fails to explain and there are both warming and cooling. Also, he assumes that the number of breaking ices because increase in the tempreature and the nature of breaking is not related to the temperature. Actually, they need more time and researches to approve this idea.
Third, the reading assert that the newspaper and an organization have considered the evidence of warming trend. The professor refutes this point by saying that it is irresponsible. He mentions that these organization and newspaper didn't wiegh the evidence and the report that mentioned in the reading was published before evaluation. In addition, newspaper was published before any exam and wanted to sell the paper, not to inform republic.
- odd sound 80
- 1. People do many different things to stay healthy. What do you do for good health? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- ethanol fuel 90
- intergrated 70
- Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 80
Comments
So, if I wrrote more than 250
So, if I wrrote more than 250 , it will consider flaw
No, you can write as much as
No, you can write as much as possible but in 20 minutes. We put it there only to remind you that it could be an issue if you don't pay attention to the time.
there is no conclusive of proof
there is no conclusive proof
that it true but if we take all thermometers and average them
that it is true but if we take all thermometers and the average of them
just thermometers which well maintained,
just thermometers which are well maintained,
we will there was no warming trend after 1970.
we will know there was no warming trend after 1970.
Sentence: In contrast, the lecturer opposes this point by explianing that it true but if we take all thermometers and average them, we will find that in the last century, the temperature was risen.
Error: explianing Suggestion: explaining
Sentence: Second, the article posits that scientists have reported ans alarming rate of breaks in the ice shelves in Antarctica.
Error: ans Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Also, he assumes that the number of breaking ices because increase in the tempreature and the nature of breaking is not related to the temperature.
Error: tempreature Suggestion: temperature
Sentence: He mentions that these organization and newspaper didn't wiegh the evidence and the report that mentioned in the reading was published before evaluation.
Error: wiegh Suggestion: weigh
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Words: 304 250
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 14 12
No. of Words: 304 250
No. of Characters: 1479 1200
No. of Different Words: 157 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.176 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.865 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.649 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 82 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 54 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.714 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.336 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.786 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.332 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.563 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.153 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4