Integrated
Both the reading passage and the lecture are about the purposes of carved stone balls from around 4000 years ago found in Scotland. That stone balls are described to be in round shape, carved from many stones and with some patterns on it. The reading passage introduces three hypotheses about the meaning of that balls, yet, the professor efficiently casts doubt on all three theories.
First, the professor argues the fact, that the balls were used as weapons. She thinks, that the holes and grooves found in some balls can not be enough evidence for that theory, because if they were used as weapons for hunting or fighting, there should have been some signs of fights and damages as by other neolethic wheapons.
Secondly, the professor gainsays the idea made by the author, that the balls were used for a weighting system. She says, that although the balls are in the same size, they are made with various types of stone, which makes them different in weight: because every stone has its own density, same sized stones can be weight different.
Finally, professor rebuts the last point made by author, which says that carved stone balls could be used as a sign of social status. She mentions, that at that time it was a tradition to bury ones things and utility with the corpse, but none of that balls were found buried with rich poeple. Also that balls have large variance of ornaments, some of them are too simple, and some of them are painted..
As we can see, the professor efficiently challanges all the three ideas made by author, because of the good state of the balls, different masses and the lack of evidence for the last theory.
- Integreted 3
- some people prefer to take courses over the internet. what are advantages of such courses? 71
- Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic, social and commercial perspectives. What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures? 78
- Soem peole 11
- While mobile phones have many advantages a number of problems have also resulted from them or the ways in which they are used What are some of these problems What solutions can you suggest for solving these problems 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 228, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: different
...arious types of stone, which makes them different in weight: because every stone has its own densit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 194, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...at that time it was a tradition to bury ones things and utility with the corpse, but...
^^^^
Line 13, column 294, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...lls were found buried with rich poeple. Also that balls have large variance of ornam...
^^^^
Line 13, column 401, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...too simple, and some of them are painted.. As we can see, the professor effi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76816608997 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17521872228 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519031141869 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.9785240798 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.272727273 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.