Integrated Essay 1 on Chevalier
Reading and lecture discusses about validity of events and stories depicted in the memoir created by Chevalier. Reading states that Chevalier may have added interesting stories in his memoir to allure people. While, lecture argues that his memoir was guenuine and based on true stories.
First, reading states that Chevalier was addicted to game and parties and also borrowed money from other swiss merchant. Reading comments that there was no possible reason of his richness. Lecture casts doubt on this statement made in reading. He argues that Chevalier owned numerous houses and he was wealthy. Furthermore, she points out that he sold some of his properties and it took time to get his money that was why he borrowed money.
Second, reading mentions that there was no way that Chevalier could have remembered each and every word from famous writer Voltaire. Thus, he claims that information written in memoir was doubtful. In contrary, lecture refutes that by saying that Chevalier used to write all detail about his conversation with writer in his journal. As a result, events presented in memoir was original.
Third, reading claims that Chevalier must have bribed other prisoners to help in breaking through jail. It was evidenced by the hole in the ceiling created by metal rod. On the other hand, lecture states that he escaped via ceiling as he mentioned, but there was no evidence that he bribed other prisoners. In addition, she points that other prisoners were stronger than him and still they did not bribe. As a consequence, lecture successfully casts doubt on points made in reading.
- Independent essay 3
- TPO 39 integrated essay 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's better to spend money enjoying life like going on vacation than to save money for the future. 86
- TPO-22 Integrated essay 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, may, second, so, still, third, thus, while, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09848484848 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48271110958 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526515151515 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8892408224 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.1764705882 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5294117647 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0807743295821 0.272083759551 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307322711062 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418865775969 0.0662205650399 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0570405792523 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187370135672 0.0443174109184 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.