integrated essay TPO16
The reading illustrates claims that the study of the ancient cultural artifacts was limited. The professor contradicts these theories by theses strong evidence.
Firstly, in the reading, it is said that because of the destruction of the building, especially from the 1950s to construct the new building without considering the archaeologically valuable sites. On the contrary, the lecture refutes the argument by stating that the recent evidence showed that if the construction was archaeologically precious, they consider it to a preseved structure.
Secondly, even though the reading claims that the fund has been considered by the government for the archaeology is not adequate, the professor argues in the lecturer that recently some financial credited have been considered for this purpose. Moreover, these resources make the archaeologists have a good oppourtunity to doing their research with more facilities.
Thirdly, the passage says that hiring a career for an archaeology project present an important challenge due to this fact that there are not many jobs in theses field for the all the time. However, the professor mentions the new condition is really beteer than the past. There are many well-paid jobs with different stages of the recruitment.
- Do you agree or disagree?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 76
- integrated essay TPO17 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. 76
- independent essay TPO18 3
- Do you agree or disagree?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries for university professors. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading illustrates claims that the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 7.30242825607 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 195.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53333333333 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04183411228 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620512820513 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2928170958 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.888888889 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7777777778 7.06452816374 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246733413061 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869276108968 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487375514588 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129365326213 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514197882861 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.