Integrated TPO47 writing
The reading passage and the listening have a conflict of about the power of flighting in Pterosaur. The writer argues some reasons that this animal could not fly due to some reasons which he stated in the passage. While the professor refutes this claim and presents other reasons to support his hypothesis.
Firstly, the author asserts that Pterosaurs were cold-blooded and this feature causes diminishing its metabolism likewise other cold-blooded animals, so they had not enough energy to generate for flighting. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this statement and he says that according to the fossil records they had covered hair on their body which prevents from heating loss of the body and it causes they have needed energy for flying more than a warm-blooded animal.
Secondly, the reading passage argues that they were giant birds and their heavy body restricted them from flying. On the contrary, the professor brings up this issue with the fact that based on the fossil bones which were found, all this animal bone were hallowed solid and this can be an evidence of an assistant for flying due to declining the weight of the body by hallow bones.
Finally, the writer claims that in all birds strong back legs are essential for flying, while this animal had small and weak muscle in the back legs. In contrast, the lecturer holds the view that they had forelimbs stronger, which could be helpful to push off the ground and they might jump enough to go up the air without the need to strong hind limb for pushing.
As a result, the professor statement rejected the hypothesis stated by the writer.
- Independent writing TPO 25Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Whether organization and club activities are as significant as academic studies? 78
- Integrated TPO 22 80
- Integrated writing TPO 25 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, likewise, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88363636364 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36303768642 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.8657498301 49.2860985944 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.3 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 7.06452816374 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272080847438 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10292012656 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695122519577 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126750492377 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707946022899 0.0443174109184 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.