Internet is good or bad
ing and the lecturer are both about the internet has fundamentally changed the people. The author argues that Due to the internet the level of knowledge of each and every person is degrading. However, the lecturer refutes the claim of the author. He is of the opinion that the level of knowledge of the person is increasing. The lecturer cast doubt on the main point made in reading by providing three reasons.
To begin with, the author argues that due to the internet we have become less adventurous, more cautious and less likely to define ourselves by our own experiences. Howbeit, This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that due to the internet the knowledge of the school student is increasing. Furthermore, he mentions that students are abreast due to use of the internet.
Secondly, According to the reading internet has had an adverse effect on our short-term attention spans and our ability to focus on the task. Nevertheless, the lecturer rebuts the claim of the author by mentioning that due to use of internet, the level of the IQ is increasing which shows that there are increases in the number of smarter people.
Finally, the author posits that the internet often removes the need for critical thinking. Nonetheless, Lecturer belives that the critical thinking of the students is increased as compared with the earlier era and reason for such increases is given to internet. He also feels that Now, students know about the chapter in advance,they will read in the class. Moreover, he says that the level of intelligency is increases in the modern world and this is because of the internet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-08 | Ayasha_Khan | 73 | view |
- READING PASSAGEWildlife crossings are structures built to allow animals to cross human-made barriers safely. These crossings promote habitat conservation by allowing connections and reconnections between habitats to avoid habitat fragmentation. They also 73
- A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature—novels, plays, and poems—than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for culture in general, and for 80
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing researchand lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests ontelevision news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest events in t 71
- Despite the obvious advantages of technology social media has generated highly negative consequences To begin with social media has created a false sense of connectivity and friendship Additionally social media has encouraged new forms of harassment throu 68
- Loyalty is the most important quality in choosing a friend 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ing
ing and the lecturer are both about the int...
^^^
Line 11, column 329, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , they
...udents know about the chapter in advance,they will read in the class. Moreover, he sa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7233037787 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 415.8 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5996348445 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9333333333 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164340231133 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630845197997 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472365497132 0.0662205650399 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109419972466 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158209097685 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.