let it burn policy in forest

Essay topics:

let it burn policy in forest

The passage claims that "let it burn" policy has a harmful effect on forests, ecology and the regional economy. However, the lecture casts doubt on the all reasons provided in the article, and presents some idea to refute all of the mentioned arguments in the passage.

First of all, the reading says that extreme fires in Yellowstone result in extensive annihilation in the park vegetation and many trees were eliminated. The professor, on the contrary, takes the view that fires could provide the opportunity for new types of plant to grow which required more sunlight. Further, she states that some seeds began to germinate after fire because they need a certain amount of heat to rise.

Second, the article asserts that fires affected the park wildlife, and alleged death of many species because of the fire. Moreover, the passage argues that the destruction of habitats and disruption in the food chain are the big concern because it could make it impossible for the survived animals return. In contrast, the speaker underlies the fact that after fire animals recover and new types of animals appeared in the park, and also some animals, for instance, rabbits became prey for other predators and the food chain works properly.

Finally, although the author brings up the idea that fires has tremendous damages on tourist attraction and decreases the local economy, the professor clarifies that the fires happened at Yellystone park is very rare and a lot of environmental parameters should happen together to cause such a disaster and since 1988 the same fires has not occurred. After forest recover itself, tourists come to the park next year.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-10 pearlchu- 86 view
2023-03-10 pearlchu- 86 view
2023-01-01 YAGUT 70 view
2022-11-26 Nina Tsarevich 3 view
2022-10-16 HSNDEK 80 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ticle, and presents some idea to refute all of the mentioned arguments in the passage. ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, for instance, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14652014652 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52582098188 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600732600733 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.8492484932 49.2860985944 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.5 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 7.06452816374 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0766098585073 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352966731643 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799213457939 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0515263073321 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701882908383 0.0443174109184 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.