The article and the lecture both discuss the benefit of taxes to prevent the bad smoking habit. The reading claims that adding taxes will reduce this bad habit and provide three reasons why it is beneficial. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes the author's assessment. He demonstrates three reasons to cast doubt on the claims made in the reading.
The first allegation of the script against which the author argues is refraining smokers from smoking by adding taxes on cigarettes.The lecturer refutes this claim by stating that the increase in price will not refrain smokers from smoking because as the price increases, smokers will start smoking a cheap low quality product which carries several health risks on smokers. Thus, worsen the already existing bad smoking effect.
Finally, the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that collecting taxes helps to improve the welfare services to people. The professor again disagree with the author's opinion. He contends that it is better to prevent smokers from smoking rather than collecting money. He states that governments might overlook bad people habits like smoking inorder to make more money which is not good neither for people nor for the government,
- Both the lecture and the reading passage discuss the danger of glass on birds. While the reading state that there are many solutions to prevent injuries to birds. The lecture refutes this, by saying that these solutions not effective to prevent birds fro 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- TPO 33: CARVED STONE BALLSReading:Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types 68
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible. First, atmospheric 3
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...he other hand, the lecturer refutes the authors assessment. He demonstrates three reaso...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g. The first allegation of the script against which the author argues is refra...
^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...m smoking by adding taxes on cigarettes.The lecturer refutes this claim by stating ...
^^^
Line 6, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that collecting taxes helps ...
^^
Line 6, column 172, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
.... The professor again disagree with the authors opinion. He contends that it is better ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, look, so, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 197.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2385786802 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43915892284 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58883248731 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.3619942232 49.2860985944 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.2 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110501384972 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408546769323 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338555990963 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773415888017 0.162205337803 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0076435412196 0.0443174109184 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.