In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team.
Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skills than any single individual is likely to possess. Also, because of the numbers of people involved and the greater resources they possess, a group can work more quickly in response to the task assigned to it and can come up with highly creative solutions to problems and issues. Sometimes these creative solutions come about because a group is more likely to make risky decisions that an individual might not undertake. This is because the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all the members and thus no single individual can be held accountable if the decision turns out to be wrong.
Taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members of the team. Team members who have a voice in making a decision will no doubt feel better about carrying out the work that is entailed by the decision than they might doing work that is imposed on them by others. Also, the individual team member has a much better chance to "shine", to get his or her contributions and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly significant, because a team's overall results can be more far-reaching and have greater impact than what might have otherwise been possible for the person to accomplish or contribute working alone.
The reading states that the approach of having a group of people as a team in order to dealing with projects has several benefits. The lecturer, however, finds the idea dubious and casts doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage, according to the results they have gained from some observations.
The author argues that due to the fact that each person have a certain thinking caps and expertise, there will be a wide variety of options for a group to cope with projects. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that, although they will be provided with a lot of alternatives, reaching an agreement among all of those people is more difficult. As a result it does not seem to be an efficient approach.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that, in the case of a creative solution, due to the fact that in a group all members have responsibilities about any work gets done, it is more prone to be undertaked. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that although it is more likely to consider as a approach for a problem, the blame is in the place of all members and all of them will be held accountable.
Finally, the reading asserts that it is more likey for a person to get her or his idea done as a practical work when is in a group instead of doing by her or his own. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that in group, in a case of failure of an idea, it will be dropped away instead of be discussed further to find an improvment for that. As a result, the success of a plan is more when it gets done by alone.
- Over the past few years a new debate has emerged over how universities should concentrate their faculty s work Many universities have begun shifting their focus away from research and toward better teaching methods However a number of reasons exist which 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Professors should prohibit the use of devices that can connect to the internet in class 73
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge exper 73
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows T 83
- In recent years many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live for example fro 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ey have gained from some observations. The author argues that due to the fact that...
^^^
Line 2, column 351, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... all of those people is more difficult. As a result it does not seem to be an effi...
^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'member'?
Suggestion: member
...on, due to the fact that in a group all members have responsibilities about any work ge...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...though it is more likely to consider as a approach for a problem, the blame is in...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.38095238095 5.08290768461 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6184733004 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493197278912 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.7652393021 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.8 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4 21.698381199 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156557247624 0.272083759551 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732927103712 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976616200493 0.0662205650399 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107704070293 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661589583222 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 11.0289183223 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.72 12.2367328918 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.