In the past, eating avocados was not considered to be necessarily beneficial. Being unaware of their beneficial properties, people used them mostly as avocado oil for different purposes. It wasn't until recently that the advantages of consuming avocados were noticed.
First of all, avocados have vital nutrients that help in lowering blood pressure. They contain as many as 20 kinds of vitamins and minerals. To be specific, avocados are rich in phytonutrients and folic acid. These nutrients are known to be beneficial especially in lowering blood pressure.
Secondly, avocados are good for a healthy pregnancy. As mentioned above, they are known to be rich in folic acid. Folic acid does not just lower blood pressure but also reduces the risk of miscarriage and neural tube defects during pregnancy.
Lastly, eating avocados can also save a lot of money. Some vegetarians tend to eat avocados because they taste similar to meat products and seafood. In this sense, people can save money by eating the meat-flavored fruit since meat is more expensive than vegetables in general.
The author of the article posed that avocados have more beneficial properties aside from its use as oil for different purposes. The professor in the lecture, however, discredited this opinion stating that none of the author's point is convincing. He went further to reject each of the author's points.
First, the author claims that avocados help in lowering blood pressure since it contains vitamins and minerals. The professor, however, claims this is false, as avocados also contain 29grams of fat which is equivalent to 300calories. Besides, he stated that fat causes weight gain which in turn increases blood pressure.
Furthermore, the author claims that avocados are good for a healthy pregnancy as it rich in folic acid. The professor falsifies this by saying that avocados, instead, reduces milk production which is not good for pregnancy. Also, he added that babies' stomach is too sensitive to digest avocados content.
Finally, the author stated that avocados taste similar to meat products and help to save a lot of money. However, the professor discredits this claim. He explained that a dozen banana is less expensive when compared to just one avocado. He further noted that avocados require a lot of water to cultivate, whereas, a lesser amount of water is required for a meat diet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-19 | SaC | 81 | view |
| 2020-12-18 | arun-kum6 | 85 | view |
| 2020-12-08 | anjuchahal7 | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-08 | Pravin s. jadhav | 95 | view |
| 2020-11-10 | abhaykhanal | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 60
- The commercial airline industry in the country of Freedonia has experienced impressive growth in the past three years This trend will surely continue in the years to come since the airline industry will benefit from recent changes in Freedonian society in 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion B 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15566037736 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62509641451 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589622641509 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2110234726 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.0769230769 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3076923077 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179595046582 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662813218467 0.0996497079465 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679020646078 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115106948726 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273424797415 0.0443174109184 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.