The article discusses a fascinating topic pertaining to upsides of the professor being on T.V shows and provides three reasons of supports. However, the professor explain that being on t.v is not beneficial for themselves in terms of professional stand point and opposes each of the author's reason.
First, the reading passage mentions that professor might get reputation in academic field and more people would have chance to learn beside campus. In contrary, the professor provides information that when the professor on t.v, they are inclined toward to reputation among fellow which is not ethical. She states that some professor may opt for an entertainment instead of education. Moreover, due to being on shows may impede them to participate to momentous conference regarding their academic field. Clearly, a disparity exists between the reading and the evidences exhibited by the professor. As a result, we can safely assume that its advantages can be neglected to its disadvantages.
Second, the reading passage pushes forth the idea that universities also benefit from appearance of professors on shows owing to they receive positive publicity which induce them to be a reputable university so that bring more students. Nonetheless, the professor contends that being on t.v shows can be time consuming for them because there is preparation process such as travel, subject and so forth. This steals student's time to learn at the campus. Consequently, we can argue that indeed the claim made in the reading is unsubstantiated.
Finally, the article posits that a great deal of individuals are represented with opportunity to learn and broaden their horizon with great pool of knowledge the professor has, otherwise they do not have chance, said. The professor refutes this point by explaining that on t.v shows professors do not mention or give very crucial academic knowledge or subject. What producers want them to provide basic background information of current event, history which already may be given by the reporter with simple homework.
In summary, while both the reading and the lecture provide interesting information with regard to merits and demerits professor's being on t.v, a significant amount of evidence support that professor stated more legitimate and tangible factors. Thus, the reading passage fails to justify the claim towards the professor.
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 85
- SOME PEOPLE ARE ORGANIZED OTHERS ARE NOT ORGANIZED. WHICH TYPE OF PERSON ARE YOU ? 76
- Why do you think some people are attract to dangerous sport or activities? 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 80
- Investigations made at laboratories in the various parts of the world indicate that apes are capable of understanding language and using linguistic responses at the level of young children just because these animals do not have the physical apparatus for 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: V
... to upsides of the professor being on T.V shows and provides three reasons of sup...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, second, so, thus, while, in summary, such as, as a result, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2011.0 1373.03311258 146% => OK
No of words: 373.0 270.72406181 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39142091153 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8626707608 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 145.348785872 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549597855228 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 419.366225166 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6591197986 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.294117647 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9411764706 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.47058823529 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163419646521 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506428392001 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467002438712 0.0662205650399 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929719156355 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223999073811 0.0443174109184 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 63.6247240618 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.