Professors attending TV shows.
The reading claims that on the appearence of the professor on a television show benefits a public, a university where he teaches and the professor himself and provides three reasons to support. However, the lecturer says that it is not real; appearenece of the professor on the television is not beneficial for neither a public who watches the show nor the university and not even the professor himself. The lecture refutes the claim and provides each reason why it is not so as decribed in the passage.
Firstly, the passage says that the professor will have reuptaion not iside the capmpus where he belongs but also in the outside in the wider area. The lecturer concedes the point but, she says that it will affect the professor from other perspective. he might seems attractive to scientific community to discuss on the specific matter of his relevant field as he may viewed as the professor of the entertainment. Furthermore, he lose his valuable time to prepare for the show and missed out the time which he can use in discussing the important matter in the academic field, research, university business and meeting with the students.
Secondly, according to the lecture, the content provided in the television by the professor merely with a deep findings and extensive knowledge. Balking of TV shows for the deep presentation is the main reason behind the superficial knowledge in the show. As it is not in deep context, it does not meet the needs of the public to learn valuable information from the show. she added that it is that weak in content even the reporter can provide this information in the cursorial preparation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | himal | view | |
| 2022-12-08 | predatoros | 86 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | rpinisetti8 | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | KnockingOn | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | daddy | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 85
- Do you agree or disagree? A person should never make an important decision alone. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 73
- Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people, buzzers, who personally promote (buzz) products to people they know or meet. The key 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...t the professor from other perspective. he might seems attractive to scientific co...
^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'loses'.
Suggestion: loses
...r of the entertainment. Furthermore, he lose his valuable time to prepare for the sh...
^^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...arn valuable information from the show. she added that it is that weak in content e...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88848920863 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79135068229 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8484080486 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.545454545 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140939880017 0.272083759551 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556861173145 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464662514987 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935498752853 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259516204717 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.