Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and indeed the representation of the woman’s face is very much like that of portraits known to be by Rembrandt. But there are problems with the painting that suggest it could not be a work by Rembrandt. First, there is something inconsistent about the way the woman inthe portrait is dressed. She is wearing a white linen cap of a kind that only servants would wear-yet the coat she is wearing has a luxurious fur collar that no servant could afford. Rembrandt, who was known for his attention to the details of his subjects’ clothing, would not have been guilty of such an inconsistency.
Second, Rembrandt was a master of painting light and shadow, but in this painting these elements do not fit together. The face appears to be illuminated by light reflected onto it from below. But below the face is the dark fur collar, which would absorb light rather than reflect it. So the face should appear partially in shadow-which is not how it appears. Rembrandt would never have made such an error.
Finally, examination of the back of the painting reveals that it was painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together. Although Rembrandt often painted on wood panels, no painting known to be by Rembrandt uses a panel glued together in this way from several pieces of wood. For these reasons the painting was removed from the official catalog of Rembrandt’s paintings in the 1930s.
The reading passage and lecture have conflicting opinions about whether or not one remarkable painting is rembrandt's own composition. The article strongly postulates that this painting is totally different from the artist's style and characteristics of rembrandt's other arts. On the other hand, The listening adamantly delineates that even though the author's compelling reasons are true the experts of portrait examined it then concluded that it is obviously rembrandt's performance because of several plausible reasons.
First and foremost, According to the author of the excerpt, the woman portraited on the painting has depicted that put on a luxurious white linen cap and fur collar coat which are not afforded to be bought the poor servant. Nonetheless, the professor offsets these points by declaring that x-ray examination proved the pigment of a portrait is not the part of the original and extra maintenance is determined around 100 years ago after the original portrait was depicted by rembrandt. Furthermore, The additional maintain is tended to look more valuable and more formal than before.
On top of this, The professor in the listening points out that adding was removed from the original simple fur collar depict so the fur collar is reflected light before illuminating woman face. Therefore, that is why it's not a partial face. these claims refute the writer's implications of how a master of the painting shadow and light style is misunderstood by the author mainly due to the fact that the woman face isn't seemed to receive light rather than reflect it.
The text lastly insists that this a panel made of glued wood is not used before on account of the fact that he usually chose the wood panels not glued together wood. The speaker in the lecture counters these indications by asserting that enlarging extra wood pieces is grander and more valuable than simple looking. In addition, it was tested that the painting was used a very similar tree as the previous he used in his work of arts.
- Many people welcome the opening of shopping areas near their homes. On the other hand, some people are strongly opposed to the construction of such facilities. If the opening of a large shopping centre in your neighbourhood were announced, would you suppo 3
- Would you prefer to live in a traditional house or in a modern apartment building? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice. 70
- Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engin 3
- These days people enjoy a lot of time away from their work and school obligations Many people use this time to visit new places and learn about them What do you think is the best way to learn about a place you are visiting for the first time Going to a mu 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All students should be required to study art and music in secondary school. Use specific reasons to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...lecture have conflicting opinions about whether or not one remarkable painting is rembrandts o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'artists'' or 'artist's'?
Suggestion: artists'; artist's
... painting is totally different from the artists style and characteristics of rembrandts...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...re, that is why its not a partial face. these claims refute the writers implications ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...nly due to the fact that the woman face isnt seemed to receive light rather than ref...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, lastly, look, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 332.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06927710843 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70011767027 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 145.348785872 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551204819277 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.821595921 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163181026241 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613999263078 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065842932255 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982713535342 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838168097318 0.0443174109184 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.