Self-driving cars
In contrast to the reading passage, which emphasizes on advantages of driving car, the lecture states the reason why autonomous driving car could be dangerous. The passage mentions three advantages of autonomous car on the human society. However, the lecture disagrees with each of the advantages mentioned in the passage giving specific reasons for all the three.
First, the reading states that most car crashes happen from human error and if we use self-driving cars this human error will not happen. The reading further bolsters this assertion citing that one car has driven for a very long distance without having any accident. Nevertheless, the lecturer denies this claim. Self-driving cars are made by humans. So, they are as well prone to errors like human driven car. He further underpin his argument stating that the car, which was praised in the reading for not having any accident, just had hit another car.
Second, the passage says that self-driving cars are good for environment because cars communicate with each other. This causes car to reduce the neccessity of starting and stoping the engine again and again. But, this claim is rejected by the lecturer. According to the lecturer, since self-driving car will need no license to drive more people with drive which will result in increased pollution. Every person from all age ranges will be using the car.
Third, according to the passage people can be engaged in other activity like reading, watching TV or working instead of driving because an autonomous car will not need a driver. However, the lecturer states that the people feel very relaxed when they drive a car. People will listen to music and radio when driving the car. This reduces there stress from day to day activities. This will help people a lot.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-14 | KnockingOn | 83 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | EiLonMask | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-16 | opryzhek | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-31 | Hoda95 | 80 | view |
| 2022-07-24 | SAPTORSHI GUPTA | 85 | view |
- Internet Usage 73
- a decline in reading the literature 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When people succeed it is entirely because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with their success Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 87
- Self driving cars 68
- Our current way of living the life will have impact on future generations Agree of disagree 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'underpins'.
Suggestion: underpins
...rrors like human driven car. He further underpin his argument stating that the car, whic...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, well, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03367003367 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45497264345 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542087542088 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2164998198 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6842105263 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6315789474 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.512232170356 0.272083759551 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183443482109 0.0996497079465 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179295084503 0.0662205650399 271% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.336836483229 0.162205337803 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108039689574 0.0443174109184 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.