Some employee tend to reduce working hours. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
In this set of materials, the writer and the lecturer are talking about the effects of new working style that includes optional working hours. Some employee prefer to work four day in a week. They also accept low income. Associated by the writer's disclosures, the lecturer states opposite ideas giving additional details and examples about the subject. The details of his speech are sumarized in the following paragraphs.
In addition the writer, companies profit increase thanks to new shorter working hour. Because workers tend to reduce their faults about job. Company may increase employee and plant cost. But lecturer add some disadvantages of this belief. Company probably spend more money to new trainee program in order to educate additional worker. It needs more office products for more employees. So company costs may increase via this optional working hours.
On the other hand, unemployment rates can reduce due to shortened working hours. İt creates new job opportunity for workers. Lecturer adds it can reduces unemployment rates, but also creates additional jobs. But companies want more and more from the workers. They should do effectively all things. They must do work in four days but it will be same five days work.
Finally, people have advantage about family and free time. They have more time doing hobbies or spend time families. But it has some disadvantages. Employees ability decrease with shorter week. They can not focus job well. Possible economical crisis, they may lose jobs. Moreover, firms need supervisor in the future which includes five days work in a week. It may obligation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Opak Pulup | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | NIMA SAEEDI | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | scorp | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | mbabar | 81 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | dipalip | 78 | view |
- Do you prefer outdoor activity or indoor 90
- The İmmigration history and progress in the America. Summarize the points made in the talk you just heard, explaining how they contrasted with points made in the reading. 3
- a 3
- The İmmigration history and progress in the America. Summarize the points made in the talk you just heard, explaining how they contrasted with points made in the reading. 3
- The American President Clay's life that wrong known aspects of life 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ed in the following paragraphs. In addition the writer, companies profit increase t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ase thanks to new shorter working hour. Because workers tend to reduce their faults abo...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 147, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...unity for workers. Lecturer adds it can reduces unemployment rates, but also creates ad...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 233, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
.... They can not focus job well. Possible economical crisis, they may lose jobs. Moreover, f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, may, moreover, so, well, in addition, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26053639847 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53748631045 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593869731801 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 13.0662251656 199% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 21.2450331126 47% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9674628735 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 52.8076923077 110.228320801 48% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.0384615385 21.698381199 46% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 7.06452816374 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145382884828 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417542699673 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373788768963 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930098381263 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164681992302 0.0443174109184 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.3589403974 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 53.8541721854 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.75 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.7273730684 47% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.498013245 57% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.