In this set of materials, the reading passage discusses the benefits of smart cars, while the lecture casts doubt on the reading for three reasons.
First of all, the writer mentions that smart cars can prevent a lot of accidents due to detective sensor around the car. The professor, on the other hand, points out that any technology can fail, so it can make some accidents. In addition, these new technologies will make more car pack together on roads which might be worse than today.
Reducing traffic problems is the second advantage of smart cars for the author because they can make a high speed. However, the speaker disagrees with this point since if smart cars can increase convenience to people, they will be driven rather than in the past. The driver, therefore, will not get a benefit from the high speed of these smart cars.
Furthermore, the reading gives information about reducing the cost of driving in that smart cars can calculate the best route for the driver. Unlike the writer, the professor thinks that it will be more expensive as technologies' costs are high such as the cost of sensors detecting other cars around these smart cars and the cost of repair or replacement parts. These costs are much more expensive than traditional car parts.
- Some people say watching TV is bad for children in all ways others say it is good for children to get knowledge Discuss both views and give your opinion 52
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 61
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Cities are getting big and overcrowded. Give reasons causes and solution for this. 67
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87096774194 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42170173639 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2437572799 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.7 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 7.06452816374 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235656259654 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101230383133 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387066288961 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13538529586 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663910395839 0.0443174109184 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.