Television appearance is of great benefit for university.
In contrast to passage, which believes that professor's presence on TV shows produces many benefits for the professor him/herself, for the university where s/he works as well as the general people. The lecturer contradicts with the author’s opinion and points out that it’s not beneficial for neither.
The passage explains that being present on television (TV) show increases the reputation of the professor and this might help him to get more funds for conducting his/her research. The lecturer refutes the passage’s claim and points out that appearing on TV show as an expert produces negative view about the professor to the scholar and donating organization. Because, usually it does not require depth knowledge of any subject matter for discussing on talk show; only shallow knowledge is enough for this purpose and this gives a negative impression of the professor to scholar of that filed.
The second point that the author of the passage makes is about enhancement of the respective university, for which s/he works. He argues that appearance of any professor to TV show increases the publicity of the university and it creates a positive image to the people about that university. The speaker refutes this claim and points out that the presence of professor on TV show is detrimental for the university. Because it requires long time to be prepared for talking at talk show and this reduces the time of professor for doing academic activities like giving lecture to students, conducting research. This decreases the quality of professor’s lecture.
Finally, in contrast to passage’s claim that presence of professor on TV show is beneficial for common people, because it gives the opportunity of talking and asking any things to an expert. But the lecturer refutes the claim of passage and points out that the benefit to public is not clear and actually, at TV show the professor does not talk about any fundamental or arcane issue which requires expertise. The speaker also tells that by doing homework a reporter can discuss about the issues, which discusses on TV show.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-09 | YACHI PATEL | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | predatoros | 86 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | KnockingOn | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | daddy | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | daddy | 75 | view |
- Map of Denham city between time period 1986 to present. 78
- Many people visit museums when they travel to new places. Why do you think people visit museums? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what the field of history is 60
- Neighbors are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what type of neighbor is the best to have?-someone who is quiet-someone who we are similar to-someone who is supportive 60
- According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year , fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year.And yet the percentage of positive reviews about specific Super Screen movies have increased in th 29
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ontrast to passage, which believes that professors presence on TV shows produces many bene...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... funds for conducting his/her research. The lecturer refutes the passage's cla...
^^^
Line 7, column 531, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the issues, which discusses on TV show.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, second, so, well, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 342.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19298245614 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86166948088 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461988304094 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.8189506322 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.615384615 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3076923077 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179146415419 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745708671958 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449494004291 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122560030954 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474699976581 0.0443174109184 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.