The reading and lecture both discuss how agnostids were living. While the reading provides three explanations about how agnostids were living, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading avers that agnostids were swimming predators and they fed on small organisms. On the other hand, the professor questions this idea by saying that we know that arthropods that live on ocean have a well developed eyes that help them to catch their prey. However, agnostids had very poor eyes and they were almost blind. So, if they chase after the prey, they should have another organs to help them catch their prey, but there is no records about that.
Secondly, the article mentions that agnostids were seafloor because they found modern arthrapods live the same way. However, the professor refutes this idea by saying that animals seafloor do not have the ability to move fast. Moreover, they live in localized are and each dwellers should be in small geographic area. However, agnostids were at multi areas . So, there were fast enough to move from area to another area. In fact, animals that have this ability are highly unusual seafloor.
Lastly, the reading states that agnotids were parasites living on large organisms because they recognized modern arthropods exist as parasites. Nevertheless, the professor contradicts this idea by explaining that the parasites population are not large and they are limited. Furthermore, too many parasites will kill their hosts. In addition, the agnostids populations is very large and they could not find fossil that can support that agnostids were parasites.
- TPO 27 integrated writing Little ice age 75
- TOEFL T P O 34 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO 28 Integrated Writing Task 43
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 60
- TPO-29 - Integrated Writing Task Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska's North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold,arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no records'?
Suggestion: there are no records
...gans to help them catch their prey, but there is no records about that. Secondly, the article me...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...fessor refutes this idea by saying that animals seafloor do not have the ability to mov...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
.... However, agnostids were at multi areas . So, there were fast enough to move from...
^^
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parasites'' or 'parasite's'?
Suggestion: parasites'; parasite's
...adicts this idea by explaining that the parasites population are not large and they are l...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27480916031 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46766010291 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545801526718 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1566978884 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.375 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5625 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.