TOEFL T P O 46 - Integrated Writing Task
According to the passage, There are many benefits in keeping patients' medical information in electronic databases. The lecture, however, doubts this idea and thinks that these benefits are uncertain.
First, the passage explains that recording information in electronic databases can help to save money. This concept is refuted by the lecture, which claims that doctors who adopt this system, also, use paper forms. They keep these forms for emergency situations and store them. Hence, this system cannot decrease costs.
Second, the passage argues that storing the information in this way can reduce the possibility of errors. The lecture, on the contrary, disagrees with this belief, suggesting that this method cannot decrease the errors that may be occurred by poor handwriting. Those doctors who adopted this method use pen and handwriting. Staff members might translate this handwriting incorrectly. As a result, the occurrence of mistakes and errors will not reduce.
Third, the author of the passage writes that the use of electronic records benefits researchers. The lecture, in contrast, states that researchers have difficulties when they want to access to all information. They face strict policies, and they have to follow this strict policy.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO 52Do you agree or disagree?The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. 60
- Essay topics: TPO 48 - Integrated Writing Task 76
- summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, third, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 193.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52331606218 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71079051045 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616580310881 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1124666472 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.1428571429 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7857142857 21.698381199 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0134048318881 0.272083759551 5% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00584057439043 0.0996497079465 6% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0210584904429 0.0662205650399 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00936766894852 0.162205337803 6% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162252785673 0.0443174109184 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.14 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.