TOEFL TPO 40 - Integrated Writing Task
In this set materials, the reading passage state that many scientists believe that people cannot live on the Venus surface. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading points by providing different reasons (and examples).
First of all, the reading passage indicates that the atmospheric pressure on the Venus surface is greater than the earth surface; therefore, a human cannot live on the Venus surface. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this view by mentioning that based on physical fact, at above the surface atmospheric pressure is lower than the surface. Hence, the human can build station above the Venus surface(about 40km upper than surface). In this situation, the Venus pressure is equal the earth pressure.
Second, the reading argues that the surface of Venus does not have water and oxygen; hence, a human must import them to the Venus; conversely, what the lecturer believes is different. He points out that the Venus surface contains some component such as CO2 and sulfuric. A human can produce water and oxygen from CO2 and sulfur by a chemical process. Thus, they do not need transfer water and O2 to the venue.
Finally, according to the reading, the Venus surface has a cloud that prevents sunlight. However, the speaker claims that clouds above that the Venus are not very dense, and they reflect sunlight to the surface. Also, people can use this energy to produce electricity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 375, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to transfer'?
Suggestion: to transfer
...hemical process. Thus, they do not need transfer water and O2 to the venue. Finally, ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11016949153 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43537559624 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533898305085 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1619868613 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7692307692 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371524838502 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135360420405 0.0996497079465 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740285793246 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213775938791 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706452759599 0.0443174109184 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.