The article states that a good way to handle new projects is to form a group of people into team and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that having a team to carry out the projects is not as efficient as having individual contributors to handle the project and he refutes each of the authors openion.
First, reading claims that a group of people have vast knowledge and skills compared to that of individuals. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that not not all the group members contributed equally to the project. Some of the team members got free ride while others worked hard. These hard workers provided lot of insights to the project. But they did not get any recognition.
Second, the article posits that team can make the decisons more quickly. Because team will have better expertise and less risk. But, the professor says that team had to conduct several meetings and it took very long to reach a common ground where everyone agreed to one decision.
Third, article states that working in a team would be rewarding for team members. It also states that there is a better opportunity for an indivial to grow if he is working in a team. The professor opposes this point by saying that one or two people within a group become very influential. As a result of this, some of the descions which the influential people do not agree will be quickly dropped even though those ideas were good. Similarly, when few people warned the team about a particular which is not good, rest of the members ignored them. When project failed at the end, blame was put on entire team.
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support 16
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College."To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current 33
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: not
...essor refutes this point by saying that not not all the group members contributed equal...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ers contributed equally to the project. Some of the team members got free ride while others...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 312, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... very influential. As a result of this, some of the descions which the influential people d...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, similarly, so, third, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71929824561 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39905080234 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575438596491 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3096160113 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0625 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391265369546 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121414386509 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497865958564 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226038115111 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295418293264 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.