Rembrandt is Dutch painters who is well known of the seventeenth century. There are no consensus on the purpose that one of the his portrait could not been drawn by Rembrandt for three different reasons.
The first reason proposes that the woman in the portrait that is possessing a white linen cap of a kind that only servants would wear and she is wearing a luxurious fur collar that servants cannot able to buy. So it does not have consistence for Rembrandt style. However, lecturer states that fur collar is added after one hundred years later after made to increase painting’s value for changing servants to aristoratic lady. Furthermore, there are some extra pigments on the portrait and it makes portrait a not-original.
Based on second reason, rembrant would never make a mistake of light and shadow. However, in this painting, below the face is dark fur collar, which has to absorb light rather than reflect it. Lecturer states that on the original painting, light and shadow orientation was well. However, after fur collar added to portrait, light shadow was removed from painting and it reflect that illuminated woman fur shows why that is particilarly shadow.
The third reason holds that it was painted on the panel made of some piece of wood glued together. However, Rembrandt often painted on wood panels. The lecturer says that extra wood glues added to make the portrait more large and more valuable. In the original of painting, it is made in single piece of wood and Rembrandt has another examples of portraits which have same tree wood panels
- Integrated essay. ETS OFFICIAL TOEFL iBT TEST-4 3
- Some people prefer to live in small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 60
- TPO-46 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which informa 61
- People learn better from those at their own level-such as fellow students or co-workers-than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors. 70
- TPO 48 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'consensuses'?
Suggestion: consensuses
...f the seventeenth century. There are no consensus on the purpose that one of the his port...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'his'?
Suggestion: the; his
...no consensus on the purpose that one of the his portrait could not been drawn by Rembra...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ses that the woman in the portrait that is possessing a white linen cap of a kind that only s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reflects'?
Suggestion: reflects
...shadow was removed from painting and it reflect that illuminated woman fur shows why th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her. However, Rembrandt often painted on wood panels. The lecturer says that extr...
^^
Line 7, column 375, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'treed'.
Suggestion: treed
...r examples of portraits which have same tree wood panels
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96226415094 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53267433798 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524528301887 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7109195447 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9285714286 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.495592913904 0.272083759551 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166610995349 0.0996497079465 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940877135173 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272948453113 0.162205337803 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353530197756 0.0443174109184 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.