The artilce states that the painting of a woman did not represent Rembrandt style work and provides three reasons of support. Conversely, the professor states that a thorough examination conclude that this paiting of a woman in the portrait did resemble Rembrandt work and she refutes each of author’s reasons.
First, the reading cliams that there is inconsistency about the woman in the protrait is dressed, such as she is wearing a white cap that only servant would wear, while she is wearing luxurious fur collar. Rembrandt was known for his attention. However, the porfessor refutes this point by saying that after the portrait was examined by x-rays, it had been discovered that the original portrait was chganged after 100 years of its painitng. Such as, a fur collar was added the woman in the portrait. She explains that this might be happened to increase its value by showing thw woman in formal, an aristocratic lady. So, there is no inconsistency in the original portrait by when the luxurious collar removed and it was portrait by Rembrandt.
Second, the article avers that this painitng elemnts like light and shadow did not fit together. This painting did not belong to Rembrandt work since he was well-known as a master of painitng shadow and light. The professor, on the other hand, opposes this point by explaining that this if this added color removed, the original scene totally fit toegther. As the professor expalins earlier, an original painting was changed, so the color and light changed too. In the orginial painitng, the woman dressed a cloth color that refected the light not partially. And conseuqntly, the painting was so realistic which is indeed the style working of Rembrandit.
Third, the reading posits that the panel of the painting made of several pieces of wodd glued together, unfamilair for Rembrandt styling of work. The professor, however, opposes this point by saying that when the changed happened, these pieces of wood was added to the priginal painting. The original painting was made from a single price of wood. Also, it is very simialr to a famous portrait by Rembrandit painting named self protrait with a hat.
- Hydropower dams are massive concrete walls placed inside rivers or streams to hold back water. Holes in the dam allow controlled amounts of water to pass through and as it moves through these holes, it passes through a machine, which converts that movemen 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People behave differently when they wear different clothes. Do you agree that different clothes influence the way people behave? Use specific examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 78
- Over the last few decades, there has been a warming trend across the globe. Many view this perceived pattern of increasing temperatures as unnatural and a result of the surge in carbon emissions produced by industrialized nations. Though some may debate t 3
- TPO-01 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reaso 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssed, such as she is wearing a white cap that only servant would wear, while she ...
^^
Line 5, column 606, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nseuqntly, the painting was so realistic which is indeed the style working of Rem...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, third, well, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 361.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02493074792 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61625806946 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490304709141 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 530.1 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 15.0 8.23620309051 182% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.918204124 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.777777778 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0555555556 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476257639553 0.272083759551 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15844392889 0.0996497079465 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819041039097 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281657339372 0.162205337803 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538321294316 0.0443174109184 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.