In the set of material, both reading passage and the lecture discuss about the contribution of famous painters, Rembrandt, to the representation of the woman in portraits on seventeenth-century.
First of all, the reading passage claims the inconsistent about the way the woman in the portrait is dressed. Rembrandt, who gave attention to the details of his subjects would not have been guilty of such an inconsistency. Even though, the author’s lecture affirms that Rembrandt gave attention to luxurious fur collar, with probably increase.
In the second place, the reading opinion is that Rembrandt paints the woman’s face dark fur collar, which would absorb light rather than reflect. However, the lecturer purpose that Rembrandt did him paint with simple colors and illuminated part of woman’s face, as very much realistic, like his paintings.
Third and last, the reading passage affirms that an examination reveals that Rembrandt was painted on a panel made of several pieces of Wood together. Although the lecture purpose that Rembrandt had a style with a fur collar.
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task 85
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 83
- Independent Task from Toefl Sampler 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the set of material, both reading pas...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n portraits on seventeenth-century. First of all, the reading passage claims...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fur collar, with probably increase. In the second place, the reading opinion...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... much realistic, like his paintings. Third and last, the reading passage affi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ade of several pieces of Wood together. Although the lecture purpose that Rembrandt had ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, third, first of all, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 1373.03311258 68% => OK
No of words: 171.0 270.72406181 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43859649123 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06006131315 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 145.348785872 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602339181287 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 419.366225166 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9157468057 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457593552421 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20643466233 0.0996497079465 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957772301169 0.0662205650399 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275980447002 0.162205337803 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102439121331 0.0443174109184 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.