The passage claims that dinosaurs like mammals are endotherm and provides three reasons of support. However the lecture claims that endotherms are not in dinosaurs and opposes each of the reasons.
First, the passage avers that some fossils shows that this animals were endotherms. The professor refutes this point. she explains that because of change in environment, animals usually change their habitat from cold place to warmer one. She claims that it is not true to judge exsistance of body temperature mechanism with this concept in dinosaurs.
Second, The passage asserts that dinosaurs have leg under their body and it is a good reason to belive that they are endotherms. Nevertheless, the professor cast doubt on this point by saying that it is only relates to their physical situation. She explains that dinosaurs are heavy and due to that they must have powerfull legs to walk.she explains that large size make them to have legs under their body and its doesnt have any correlation to body temprature.
Finally, The reading claims that the connection between dinosaurs bone's structure and Harvesian canals can be infered as a symptom that they are endotherm. Nonetheless, the professor opposes this point. She explains that bone Haversian canal are related to their growth. In different period, wether the weather is cold or warm it differs. She believes that It is not true to guess if they are endotherm or not through this characteristics because it always changes in different climate situation.
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Some people have ambitious dreams and keep following them but other people always focus on realistic goals and try to achieve them Which do you think is better 75
- TPO 46 86
- Integrated TPO 42 75
- TPO 30Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... and provides three reasons of support. However the lecture claims that endotherms are ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...sage avers that some fossils shows that this animals were endotherms. The professor ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...erms. The professor refutes this point. she explains that because of change in envi...
^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...m to have legs under their body and its doesnt have any correlation to body temprature...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 419, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ss if they are endotherm or not through this characteristics because it always chang...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 22.412803532 201% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17479674797 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63735940244 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532520325203 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.686809307 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9285714286 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323800728794 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104335899697 0.0996497079465 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644260550819 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187206443929 0.162205337803 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246974109181 0.0443174109184 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.