In the set of material, the reading passage and lecture say about Endotherms animals. However, both have opposed reasons about the point and explain why. There are 3 reasons said.
First of all, the Reading passage affirms that have reptiles, and modern reptiles are not endotherms. Even though, the lecturer purpose that they do not have proves that these animals are not endotherms.
In the second place, the Reading passage affirms that there is a connection between endothermy and the position and movement of the legs, moreover, the physiology of endothermy allows the sustained physical activity. However, the lecture opinion is not about this. She says that the animal need high energy, and support all body, moreover, has a very large size.
Third and last, to the reading passage, Haversian canals there is a connection between endothermy and bone structure. The canals house nerves and blood vessels that allow the living animal to grow quickly, and rapid body growth is, in fact, a characteristic of endothermy. Whilemean, the lecturer says that these characteristics are animals, not endothermy.
- TPO-14 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 80
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing TaskSummarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the reading passage. 85
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the set of material, the reading pass...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...plain why. There are 3 reasons said. First of all, the Reading passage affirm...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that these animals are not endotherms. In the second place, the Reading p...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...body, moreover, has a very large size. Third and last, to the reading pass...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, second, so, third, while, in fact, first of all, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 1373.03311258 69% => OK
No of words: 177.0 270.72406181 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32203389831 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67289562648 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 145.348785872 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564971751412 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.2421911416 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6363636364 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0909090909 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24282371743 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838390155404 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620981975052 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14121227692 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065085344326 0.0443174109184 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.