The reading and passage both is about the fuel-cell-engine which needs to replace the internal-combustion fuel, whereas the author of the reading says that those problems' can be reduced by using hydrogen based fuel. But, the lecture casts doubt on the statement given by the author in the reading by providing three defensive reasons which proves that hydrogen fuel is not beneficial.
First of all, the author of the reading points out the fact that internal combustion fuel relies on petroleum, gasoline and diesel which are very rare to find and are in extinction rate. So, he posits that hydrogen fuel will be useful as it can be derived from various natural resources such as natural gas, water which are renewable resources. However, the professor disputes this point. He says that the hydrogen is not as easily found as the author of the reading states. He further adds more information by explaining that hydrogen cannot be directly derived from water. For example, for the uses of hydrogen as a fuel it must be in a pure liquid form which is highly artificial and are very difficult to derived which needs very cool temperature of -283 degree celsius.
Secondly, the author of the reading claims that hydrogen fuel is attractive as it solve the pollution problem which helps to reduce the environmental problems. For an instance, the production of carbon dioxide of combustion-fuel are more dangerous to nature. Nevertheless, the lecture argues that hydrogen fuel will not solve the problem. He also says that producing pure hydrogen need a process of purification which cause coal and oils to burn and cause the pollution.
Finally, according to the author of the reading people will be more likely to use the hydrogen as it costs low than the internal combustion fuel. He also thinks that the hydrogen fuel is more effective than the combustion fuel. On the other hand, the lecture refutes this statement. He believes that manufacture of fuel-cell platinum is rare to find and also expensive. Moreover, he also thinks that without the platinum the hydrogen alone cannot be able to generate the electricity which helps to run the car.
- Prevention is better than cure.Researching and treating diseases are too costly so it would be better to invest in preventative measures. 84
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher's ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. Use specific reasons and support your answers with examples 78
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'solves'?
Suggestion: solves
... that hydrogen fuel is attractive as it solve the pollution problem which helps to re...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 359.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74932196543 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470752089136 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 560.7 419.366225166 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8998997995 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.588235294 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.70588235294 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.43579510012 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153755020117 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992132782309 0.0662205650399 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295591861169 0.162205337803 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317597681718 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.