The passage and the professor are argued about the possible reasons that contribute to the decline of the sea otters. The article states that the small mammals like sea otter play an important role in the eco-system, unlikely they are declining because of the contamination and the predator attacks. However, the professor says that ongoing investigation states that the predator theory is mostly causing and she refutes the each of the author's opinion.
First, the passage states that the collected water sample revealed the fact that it contains the oil and the other industrial chemicals lead to the decrease of the infection resistance and causing death indirectly. The professor opposes this point by saying pollution theory is weak, She explained that, if the chemical contamination is the reason for the drop the sea otter count, should be the dead mammals at the beach of the Alaskan coast but the investigators couldn't find any dead otters.
Second, the article avers that along with the environmental pollution, predator attack causes the decline in their number. However, the professor contended this point by saying it is difficult to find. She illustrated that if it is because of the predator nothing showed up on the seashore. she also mentioned that human hunters are the possible cause for the decline.
Finally, the passage climes that uneven distribution of the mammals proved that rough pollution over the sea coast. In contrast, the lecture posits that accessible location should be important to survive. The swallow rocky location is the favorable location for them. She also illustrated that uneven distribution of such locations might cause the irregular distribution of otters.
- TPO-12 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 81
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 66
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 73
- TPO-19 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 438, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...causing and she refutes the each of the authors opinion. First, the passage states t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...futes the each of the authors opinion. First, the passage states that the colle...
^^
Line 2, column 467, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...the Alaskan coast but the investigators couldnt find any dead otters. Second, the arti...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...ator nothing showed up on the seashore. she also mentioned that human hunters are t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27205882353 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71637193156 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9989151776 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.307692308 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290409723635 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899677417381 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661283573051 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167673905524 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509060674407 0.0443174109184 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.