The article states that there is a professional painting of Austen's portrait which has come up for sale. However, the professor explains that the evidence and reasons, which prove that the painting is Austen's, are not convincing and he thinks the portrait is loosely connected to Austen's family faces and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the passage declares that her family accepted and recognized the painting as a portrait of Jane. Nevertheless, the lecturer contradicts this point by stating that the painting was exposed publicly seventy years after Jane's death and her relatives at that time had never seen her because she was not alive and they could not confirm the correctness of the painting.
Second, the article claims that the face in the portrait clearly resembles the one in Cassandra's sketch. On the other hand, the professor contends that Austen's family is very extensive and vast and many teenagers resemble Jane in her family. Furthermore, there are some pieces of evidence which demonstrated that the painting was one of her relatives' portrait.
Third, the reading avers that the painting was depicted when Austen was a teenager by Ozias Humphrey. Nonetheless, the lecture opposes this point by stating that the blank paper of the painting is William's who came to London when Jane had become seventy years old and the portrait can not be depicted when she was a teenager.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- tpo 14 salvage logging 93
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 83
- TOEFL T P O 15 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Forest- TPO14- Salvage logging- Insects 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09913793103 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5752894565 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543103448276 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4910317376 49.2860985944 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.444444444 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459251649558 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207628364646 0.0996497079465 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066117232353 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278920178949 0.162205337803 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586171311028 0.0443174109184 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.