The reading passage states three reasons to support that the subject of the painted portrait of a teenage girl presented by the Austen family is Jane Austen herself. The lecturer argues that these evidences are not convincing at all.
Firstly, when Austen’s family, her descendant, authorized the portrait as an illustration of Austen’s letters, it was almost 70 years after Austen’s death. So Austen’s descendants would never see her in the real life. They cannot make sure for the subject is Austen herself.
Secondly, Austen’s family is a big family, the relatives of Austen share the same genes. There are so many female teenagers in her family, and are very resemble with her. We could believe that the face in the portrait is one of those relatives.
Last, even the painting is not signature and marked the date. But we know the man who began to sell the canvas for the painting in English when Austen were 27 years old. It means the painting is older than Austen.
With these three details provided, the lecturer totally dispute the statement in the reading passage and make the conclusion that the portrait cannot be Austen herself.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO 12 - Jane Austen Portrait 75
- TOEFL T P O 49 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- do agree or disagree/ playing computer games is a waste of time and children should not be allowed to play them 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 194.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0824742268 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69399808418 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582474226804 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4219040064 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1666666667 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.505992292726 0.272083759551 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179909571978 0.0996497079465 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106021173822 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27471089527 0.162205337803 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813420502043 0.0443174109184 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 63.6247240618 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.