The reading and lecture both discuss the fossils and the right to either sell them to riche collectors or exhibit them in museums.
first of all the author claims that fossils are prone to be traded in black business, thus be monopolize by riches instead be published in museums so everyone has the possibility to enjoy them, in other hand the lecturer believe that trading fossils is not necessary a waste, in contrast it may help scientists to discover a new fossils that by their own can’t find them.
Secondly, the author states that comerchials are untrained or uninterested to deal careful with fragile fossils so they may destroy an important evidence that helps scientists to discover a new precious informations and he stated the position of oviraptor in dinausors’s nest as an example,
Otherwise the lecturer point out in the fact that it is better for universities, institutions and scientists to have many discovers even sometimes damaged instead having few discovers.
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 56
- TPO-05 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 76
- TPO-12 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Some people believe that children s leisure activities must be educational otherwise they are a complete waste of time Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experience 63
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...llectors or exhibit them in museums. first of all the author claims that fossils a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'fossil'?
Suggestion: fossil
...t may help scientists to discover a new fossils that by their own can't find them....
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the author states that comerchials are untrained or uninterested to deal carefu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, may, second, secondly, so, thus, even so, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 1373.03311258 61% => OK
No of words: 162.0 270.72406181 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 4.04702891845 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94309827653 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.66049382716 0.540411800872 122% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 419.366225166 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 13.0662251656 23% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 54.0 21.2450331126 254% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 147.443397803 49.2860985944 299% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 279.0 110.228320801 253% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 54.0 21.698381199 249% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 24.6666666667 7.06452816374 349% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330110872953 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.213308158072 0.0996497079465 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389055055956 0.0662205650399 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176193130996 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653262380894 0.0443174109184 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 29.9 13.3589403974 224% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 16.67 53.8541721854 31% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.4 11.0289183223 221% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.42419426049 120% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 23.6 10.498013245 225% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 24.0 11.2008830022 214% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.