Both the reading and lecture are about effect of jungle firing and storming and if doing salvage logging recover damage and have economic beneficiary or not? Reading says jungle firing has so many bad affect but by salvage logging can have beneficiary for economy and jungle health. But professor disagrees and expresses three evidences to refutes reading arguments.
First, reading says by salvage logging new spaces will be created to growing up new threes immediately. Professor disagrees and argues that forest cleaning after disaster haven't benefit for growth trees because if threes stays on floor and decompose they reach earth of good materials useful for threes growing.
Second reading to clear it's mean better says without salvage logging dead threes stay on earth floor make a good habitat for insects which finally cause so many damages to live healthy threes. In the lecture professor says insects population increase has long term benefit because create food for bird and other useful insects.
Second, salvage logging has economic benefits because of producing wood usable by industries and more job opportunely for local workers rather than when salvage logging done normally. In the lecture professor disagrees and says salvage logging after forest disaster doing by helicopter and other expensive vehicles which cause small economic beneficiary.
- At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.please help me refine my essay. 76
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 60
- TPO-06 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 66
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 171, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...ues that forest cleaning after disaster havent benefit for growth trees because if thr...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a good habitat for insects which finally cause so many damages to live healthy th...
^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
...ys insects population increase has long term benefit because create food for bird an...
^^^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...food for bird and other useful insects. Second, salvage logging has economic ben...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 22.412803532 13% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46226415094 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35303141776 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589622641509 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8109731135 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 7.06452816374 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369811823831 0.272083759551 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159604373981 0.0996497079465 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749371574014 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232576769239 0.162205337803 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494493803576 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.