TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi
The reading claims that Torreya is one of the evergreen trees which are extinction in the states of Florida. The author elaborates his viewpoints by providing three main reasons to maintain the Torreya from extinction. Nevertheless, the professor believes that none of the solutions are satisfied and refutes the author's concepts.
First, the reading asserts that reestablishing option of these trees in the same location and states that Northern Florida as the best site for favorable microclimate. However, the professor refutes this view by stating that it's unlikely to become successful; hence, global warming alters this area remarkably warmer than 1000 years ago. Since these trees require cold and damp area, she indicates that drier weather in this area is becoming widespread as the cause of the less surviving in the environment.
Furthermore, the article avers that move Torreya trees to a different location which similar to ancient period and microclimate of trees. On the other hand, the professor brings the fact that significant changes could be harmful to the entire ecosystem. She states example of black Yoko trees as the negative experience; hence, it spread so quickly on different areas by scientist and impose other plants to extended as numerous negative consequence.
Finally, the article posits that preserving Torreya in lab and research center to keep up this kind. On the contrary, the professor casts doubt on this claim by stating that it not a perfect solution since these trees not able to resist the disease if it plants in the artificial environment. In addition, states that large areas and diversity as two essential requirements for these trees which can't afford by research centers. Not sufficient capacity and variety are the cause that these trees will not survive from the disease.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | faisalaldebei | 81 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Shiimaaa | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | S M Naimul Mamun | 3 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | S M Naimul Mamun | 3 | view |
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 81
- tpo51 3
- TPO 49. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 73
- TPO 51- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants, the largest land animal in the modern world. Social animals that live in herds, elephants are native to both Africa and Asia. Their large ears, long trunk, and long life span have made elephants one o 90
- TPO49-The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 397, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...tial requirements for these trees which cant afford by research centers. Not suffici...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, in addition, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29794520548 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72400239718 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558219178082 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6759707494 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305133938011 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105607718913 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666674877156 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177316792221 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181601591 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.