TPO 21
In the reading passage, the author claims that the genetic modification, a process through which scientists change the organism's genes, has a variety of advantages by pointing out three reason of support. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and states that the experts are not assured whether these modified plants are as great as their first condition and she demonstrates some evidence to refute the mentioned benefits.
At first, the author argues that the modified species are more resistant against unfavorable conditions by bringing up the papaya modified plants as an example. Conversely, the lecturer points out that may be the new plants are more resistant but it does not guarantee their survival. As a matter of fact, when non-modified plants are exposed to adverse circumstances such as the invasion of insects or bad climate, it is possible that 1 type of them dies. Nonetheless, due to their genetic diversification, the rest of them will be capable to tolerate. Although, if one particular factor such as a new pest adds to the modified-trees environments, almost all of them will wipe out. Actually, since their uniform genetics causes they cannot thrive in atmosphere for which they are not designed.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that economic advantages for farmers can be accounted as other positive consequences of planting the modified-plant. On the other hand, the professor disputes this idea by clarifying that there are some hidden cost in this method. As an example, not only do farmers pay for each modified seed three times more than a normal seed, but also each time that the farmers intend to plant the seeds they should purchase them from the companies providing them. Therefore, the cost adds up.
Finally, the author asserts that this process hinder overusing of wild trees. The lecturer, though, dismisses it by subscribing to the point that having altered the genes of plants, people render the natural plants more vulnerable. Indeed, these modified plants grow aggressively since they consume most of the soil nutrition, water and other factors which their abundance is vital for nurturing the natural trees. Consequently, so dense become the natural environment with modified plants that no source left for germinating the wild trees.
- Getting the advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting that from your peers. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific reasons and examples to support you 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 86
- Agree or Disagree: In order for a business to succeed, it must put more money in advertising. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organisms'' or 'organism's'?
Suggestion: organisms'; organism's
...ess through which scientists change the organisms genes, has a variety of advantages by p...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, in addition, such as, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1373.03311258 146% => OK
No of words: 383.0 270.72406181 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21671018277 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82395261941 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 145.348785872 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582245430809 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 419.366225166 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1961178814 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.875 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9375 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5625 7.06452816374 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336106687338 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958289251563 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490372761677 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180973167992 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685840054026 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 63.6247240618 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.