The reading and lecture are both about ethanol and gasoline. the reading claims that Ethanol isn't a good substitution for gasoline providing proves to the claim. The lecture contends with the present claim in the passage, the lecture believes th idea is presentable and gasoline is a good alternative providing substantial reasons in the ensuing paragraph.
First of all, the article states that dangerous problems are caused by gasoline in the aspect of global warming where carbon dioxide is burnt for fuel and heat is trapped. However, the lecture posits that the gasoline has presents no effect of global warming since the carbon dioxide found in the possess of growing a plant is absorbed in the air an alleviated.
Secondly, the passage mentions that plants are constantly reduced for fuel due to the consumption by animals like cow goat and so on. To a great extent, the plants which severs as food cwill gradually disappear. The professor of the lecture on the other hand states that cellulose comes into limelight because the plants possess cellulose uneaten to animals therefore, plants are unlikable to reduce.
Finally, the prices of the two object in question are presently at the same rate according to the author of the passage. It was established that tax imposed by the government can increase th price of ethanol or to this, other people can help to work on the price. In contrast, th lecture challenges that more purchase of ethanol leads to a drop and competing wont be needed.
In conclusion, the professor has effectively elaborated on why gasoline is a good substitute which the challenged the reading to a reasonable manner.
- do you agree or disagree?it is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than by doing exercise. 78
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 80
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...re are both about ethanol and gasoline. the reading claims that Ethanol isnt a good...
^^^
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...soline. the reading claims that Ethanol isnt a good substitution for gasoline provid...
^^^^
Line 2, column 293, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rming since the carbon dioxide found in the possess of growing a plant is absorbed in the a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01090909091 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69741228919 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552727272727 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.623268945 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.833333333 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06452816374 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281006039867 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988731270427 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058690769527 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130548934274 0.162205337803 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517070007408 0.0443174109184 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.