tpo 23
The reading stats some hypothesis in terms of declining of Yellow tree However the professor claims that this reasons is not adequate and supports his idea be providing some explanation.
First, the author explains that insect parasite specially bark beetle may be responsible for this phenomena. In contrast, the lecture refutes this hypothesis. He says that the cedar trees are much resistant to insect more that other trees. In some areas there are some poison insects that the cedar trees are not decline. decreasing in cedar trees by insect have occurred in seek trees.
secondly, the passage explicates that brown bears can be attributes in declining phenomena. Sometimes, they craw the tree for eating tree bark. However, the professor the bear can be responsible in diminishing of cedar trees because of in an island which has any bear, some cedar trees have declined and population of trees have no any relation with bears.
Finally, the author explains that gradually changing climate may be to blame. According to research the climate have altered in the last 10 years. Conversely, the lecture claims that changing in weather have not prominent impact on tree population. He gives an example to illustrates that in some different elevation plant there are many cedar trees. The climate can not be responsible in declining.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts some hypothesis in terms of declining of Yellow tree However the professor cla...
^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ally bark beetle may be responsible for this phenomena. In contrast, the lecture ref...
^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Decreasing
...s that the cedar trees are not decline. decreasing in cedar trees by insect have occurred ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...insect have occurred in seek trees. secondly, the passage explicates that brown bear...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...e declined and population of trees have no any relation with bears. Finally, t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19815668203 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62487605497 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539170506912 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1287857788 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5714285714 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440952271483 0.272083759551 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148874886979 0.0996497079465 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659862188806 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259822569755 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832547294876 0.0443174109184 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.