The reading passage present three inferences of those materials found in T.Rex's leg bone seems to be blood vessels, red blood cell and collagen matrix, separately. However, the lecturer poses some evidences against those inferences.
To begin with, the reading suggests that those many small branching channels may be location for blood vessels, but the lecturer holds that the hollow in bones may not for blood vessels, which may be created by some bacteria. Therefore, the soft substance may be the residue of bacteria colonies.
In addition, the reading holds that those spheres may be the remains of red blood cells, but it is contradicted to point out in lecture that those spheres were located the same place in other primitive animals. However, those primitive animals did not have a red blood cell. As a result, those spheres may be some red mineral.
Finally, it is said in the reading that the dinosaur leg bone contained collagen, a fibrous protein. On the contrary, the lecturer argues that collagen cannot be found in the fossil from over 100 thousand years ago. Collagen cannot last for such a long history, because the earliest collagen found in the fossil is from 70 million years ago. Therefore, the collagen may come from the recent source like the researchers' hands.
- TPO-16 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- reasons about an asteroid could be the best colonization option 76
- we should be optimistic when we fail. 66
- some rules of societies may push too hard on the youths. 73
- young people today do not have influence on the important decision for society. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Rexs
...nferences of those materials found in T.Rexs leg bone seems to be blood vessels, red...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, may, so, therefore, in addition, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03255813953 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44261782275 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0554319417 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3636363636 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347427854042 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137823598233 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815908863051 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209269338129 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246843594869 0.0443174109184 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.