The reading and the lecture are both about whether the ancient copper cylinder jar with iron rode inside that were found from Iraq is an electric battery or not. The author of the reading believes there are three reasons why it is not likely to be a battery. The lecturer challenges the statement made by the author. She is of the opinion that what reading is saying is not convincing, and the battery theory could be correct.
First of all, the author suggests that if the jars were batteries, there should have been some wires to be connect to them, but there was none. It is mentioned that there were no evidence of any wire around them. The argument is refuted by the lecturer. She says people who found the vessels were not archeologists but local people. Furthermore, she argues that since they were not experts, the wires were not recognized and could be overlooked or even thrown away.
Secondly, the article posists that the copper cylinders look the same as copper cylinders from the nearby region, where it is known that the cylinders were used for containing sacred texts. The article notes that the same shape indicates it is very likely that the copper cylinders from Iraq were used in the same fashion, and the scrolls could simply be disintegrated over time. The lecturer, however, casts doubt on this by asserting that the vessels looking the same as other vessels from the nearby region prove nothing. The lecturer elaborates on this by mentioning that at first they could be used as scroll containers, but later the same material combinations make electricity might be discovered. As a result, the vessels could have been used for another purpose than ther previous usage were.
Finally, it is stated in the reading that what could ancient people do with electricity, which was useless to them. The author establishes that there were no devices that use electricity. Hence, electricity was no utilization purpose on them. The lecturer, on the other hand, opposes that electricity could have been used for inducing mild shock or tingling sensations, which made them think of an unseen force. She puts forth the idea that it used for healing and reducing muscle pain.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 76
- Your professor is teaching a class on political science Write a post responding to the professor s question In your response you should express and support your personal opinion make a contribution to the discussion in your own words An effective response 80
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- Professor Life expectancies are increasing all over the world nowadays Some of you probably know someone who is more than 100 years old Before our next class I want you to consider the following question What factors do you think have contributed to the i 80
flaws:
No. of Words: 373 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 19 12
No. of Words: 373 250
No. of Characters: 1771 1200
No. of Different Words: 180 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.395 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.748 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.363 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 115 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 84 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.632 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.028 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.526 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.321 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.321 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.201 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4