TPO 26
In the reading passage, the author claims that the zebra mussel, a shellfish species living in freshwater, presents serious problems for the freshwater fishes by pointing out three reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and states that indeed, there are some solutions to hinder population growth of the zebra mussel. He points out some evidence to refute the ideas mentioned in the reading.
At first, the author argues that having conveyed the zebra mussel by the ships, they assist scattering its population across new regions in the United States. The lecturer brings up the fact that it was true in the past due to lack of knowledge. For instance, previously, the ships would carry freshwater of Europe, ballast water, and poured it in the United States water. Actually, the freshwater is the most favorable environment for expanding the zebra mussel. In comparison, nowadays, not only are ships capable to function without freshwater, but they also do have capacity to become laden with salt water of ocean while they are not presence it oceans. Hence, the zebra mussel become enable to colonize in other areas spread since they cannot survive in salt water.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that the zebra mussel population can enormously increase due to absence of any predator. On the other hand, the professor disputes this point by clarifying the fact that although, it is true at the beginning of their colonization, there are some other species which are seeking to find new food resources. For instance, the zebra mussel can be accounted as good food for birds. Therefore, they cannot be dominate in their new habitat for a long time.
Finally, the author asserts that the zebra mussel causes a substantial drop in the overall fish population. The lecturer, though, dismisses this idea by subscribing the fact that the decline occur in the population of plankton eaters fish. As a matter of fact, the zebra mussel produces nutrition in their habitat which provides suitable environment for nourishing kind of other fish species in the bottom of water.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | Apolytos | 85 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | zaid | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | DarkSaitama | 60 | view |
| 2021-02-12 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-26 | marathon24h | 80 | view |
- A/D? Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Increasingly, robots and computers are being used to do work that humans once had to do for themselves. Some people believe the effect of this change will be mostly positive and helpful for humans. Other people believe that robots and computers will take 73
- Do you agree or disagree? Rather than help children with their schoolwork, parents should encourage their children do their work independently 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, kind of, as a matter of fact, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1373.03311258 133% => OK
No of words: 360.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07777777778 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59320098682 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 145.348785872 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 419.366225166 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5377334276 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3125 7.06452816374 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451978753096 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146220663736 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073823399679 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263629099064 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620585491535 0.0443174109184 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 63.6247240618 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.