According to the given set of the reading passage, it is author's conviction that little ice age happened because of several possible reasons, which are mentioned in the text. On the contrary, the lecturer repudiates all of the author's justification for the appearance of the ice age by providing some counter-argument reasons that are as follows:
First of all, the reading holds the view that, fluctuation of Gulf stream, which has a significant influence on the climate, is responsible for the emergence of little ice age. However, the lecturer finds this reason unconvincing by asserting that new information rejects this claim because of the fact that the most and prominent effect of Gulf Stream is in the Europe and the North America, But the little ice age occurred in sudden areas such as Africa and even News land and thus, the Gulf stream current cannot explain this phenomenon.
Secondly, although the author posits that produced dust and sulfur gas by volcanic eruptions can be another reason for this event, the lecturer says that even though these volcanic eruptions occurred at that period, but there is not any report of very powerful and striking visual effects. In other words, these eruptions were not strong enough to diminish the global temperature by preparing an obstacle to sunlight.
As the last point to emphasize the reading claim, the author believes that the abundance of forests and as a result, the reduction of Carbon Dioxide is the last reason for the occurrence of little ice age. Yet again, the lecturer states on the opposite side and contradicts that it has not been sufficient time to happening of this phenomena. By increasing population quickly, the forests cut again in order to flourish crops and food. Consequently, it was not long enough to cool climate.
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him 80
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 80
- Integrated Writing 3
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 80
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ jobs. Agree or disagree? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...n the contrary, the lecturer repudiates all of the authors justification for the appearanc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ary, the lecturer repudiates all of the authors justification for the appearance of the...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...that new information rejects this claim because of the fact that the most and prominent effect of Gulf S...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ot been sufficient time to happening of this phenomena. By increasing population qui...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, such as, as a result, first of all, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05351170569 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71129596804 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558528428094 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 21.2450331126 155% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.766455977 49.2860985944 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 167.888888889 110.228320801 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2222222222 21.698381199 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.8888888889 7.06452816374 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312690622159 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11832069898 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576417531171 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177538283136 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325924810142 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.3589403974 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 53.8541721854 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.0289183223 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.498013245 145% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.2008830022 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.