Quakers are the odd underwater sounds in the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean moving fast, which cannot be detected by the submarine's sonar. The passage presents three hypotheses regarding the causes of Quakers, all of which are contested by the lecture.
First off, the professor dismisses the orca theory with two arguments. On one hand, orcas always live in the surface of water rather than deep marine, although the two kinds of sounds are similar with each other. One the other hand, if orcas had indeed strayed nearby the submarines, they should been captured by sonar.
In addition, that giant squids, known as intelligent animals, emit the sound with curiosity about the submarines is also dismissed by the professor. In her view, Quakers were first detected in the 1960s and disappeared by the 1980s, While giant squids continue to live in the deep ocean .She argues that if squids were the source, there would be no explanation why the Quakers started and ended all of a sudden.
Last, it’s considered incredible that the sounds come from foreign military technology. First, Quakers must change directions quickly and are capable of moving around, but no submarine at that time was this agile. Second, the Quakers were quite silent sounds, but all submarines at that time would emit engine sounds.
- TPO 55 Writing IntegratedBecause of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification 80
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 81
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'submarines'' or 'submarine's'?
Suggestion: submarines'; submarine's
...g fast, which cannot be detected by the submarines sonar. The passage presents three hypot...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...quids continue to live in the deep ocean .She argues that if squids were the sourc...
^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: She
...ids continue to live in the deep ocean .She argues that if squids were the source, ...
^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from foreign military technology. First, Quakers must change directions quickly a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09677419355 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41612687885 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626728110599 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6024192958 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.6 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361212928806 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125506989585 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672871773074 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193727013859 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465127195862 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.