The reading and the lecture are both about the carved stone balls that are found in Scotland. The author of the reading states about the importance of stone balls also mentions there are several theories, and provides three reasons for support. However, the lecturer refutes by saying none of the claims are convincing.
First, the article claims that craved stone balls are used as a weapon by holes and grooves around the balls. However, the lecturer refutes this point by saying that these balls generate signs of awareness and use. Furthermore, he mentions these cracked stone balls are used to process the surface.
Second, the reading explains that the stone balls are used to measure the weights of grains and the other food as they were uniform in size at 70mm in diameter. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this point by explaining that stone balls are made with different types like sand, cream or quartz. Similarly, they have different density. Hence, they cannot be used as the weighing systems.
Third, the text explains that the stone balls server as a social status of their owners because they have elaborate designs. However, the professor opposes this point by saying that stone balls are inconsistent and have different patterns like complex and simple patterns. In addition, if the famous or high ranked persons die, they are kept in tombs or graves. where they cannot be used as social status symbols.
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 60
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: uniform
... grains and the other food as they were uniform in size at 70mm in diameter. Nevertheless, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 41, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'balls'' or 'ball's'?
Suggestion: balls'; ball's
...Third, the text explains that the stone balls server as a social status of their owne...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 363, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Where
... die, they are kept in tombs or graves. where they cannot be used as social status sy...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, similarly, so, third, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1201.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06751054852 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31122741242 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514767932489 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6861366813 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7857142857 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9285714286 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478592692562 0.272083759551 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170313840646 0.0996497079465 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995508683009 0.0662205650399 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293311718001 0.162205337803 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401351543419 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.